AxisCare runs day-to-day home care operations: scheduling, billing to Medicaid, VA, and LTCi payers, electronic visit verification, and — through its newer Skilled Care line — clinical documentation for in-home skilled services. Its mobile caregiver app captures clock-in and clock-out time by GPS and telephony, and AxisCare’s own mobile-app tutorial states that once recorded, that time cannot be changed in the app. Changes go through a separate EVV Correction Form, but AxisCare’s own documentation does not describe who reviews or approves that correction, whether a reason is required, or an approval status distinct from whoever makes it. Keito is the layer in between: AI-drafted time entries a caregiver or office staff member confirms, reviewed and approved by someone else, with any change reasoned and recorded, before the hours become a paycheck or a payer bill.
Illustrative review queue
Illustrative pay period
Hours reviewed
Entries confirmed
61
Caregivers reviewed
17
Visits covered
203
Hours tied to each visit
Caregiver, client, and shift on every entry
Reviewed before payroll runs
A separate reviewer confirms hours before the batch closes
Evidence behind payroll and billing
Reviewed hours back the payroll run and the payer bill
AxisCare’s mobile caregiver app clocks a visit in and out using GPS and telephony verification, and AxisCare’s own mobile-app tutorial states that once a caregiver clocks in or out, that time cannot be changed in the app. When a visit record needs to change, AxisCare provides a separate EVV Correction Form, described on its site as covering when, why, and how to correct electronic visit verification records. What AxisCare’s own documentation does not describe is who completes that review, whether a stated reason is required, or an approval status distinct from whoever makes the correction, before the visit’s hours reach payroll or a payer bill. Keito answers the question that leaves open: did a reviewer distinct from whoever corrected the record actually confirm each caregiver’s hours before they became a paycheck or a bill.
Set up caregivers, office staff, and reviewers in Keito in days — AxisCare keeps running scheduling, billing, and electronic visit verification exactly as it does today.
Keito drafts a time entry from the shift a caregiver worked, so staff confirm hours instead of routing a correction through AxisCare’s EVV Correction Form with no documented reviewer distinct from whoever fills it out.
A separate reviewer approves payroll and billing status before the period closes, then hands the approved hours to payroll and billing as evidence.
A correction form inside home care software, not an independent payroll gate
AxisCare is published as home care software: scheduling, billing to Medicaid, VA, and LTCi payers, electronic visit verification, and — through its Skilled Care line — clinical documentation for in-home skilled nursing, physical therapy, and occupational therapy services. Its mobile caregiver app captures clock-in and clock-out time by GPS and telephony, and its own mobile-app tutorial confirms that once recorded, a caregiver cannot change that time in the app. That point-of-capture record is locked, which is a real integrity property — but visits do need correcting, and AxisCare’s answer is a separate EVV Correction Form, described as covering when, why, and how to correct electronic visit verification records. What AxisCare’s own EVV, billing, and reporting pages do not describe is who reviews or approves a completed correction, whether a reason is required, or an approval status distinct from whoever made the change, before that visit’s hours reach payroll or a payer bill. Keito’s argument is not that home care agencies need a new scheduling, billing, or visit-verification platform — AxisCare already publishes all of that, and Keito makes no claim to electronic visit verification, payer billing, or clinical documentation of any kind. It is that a corrected record deserves a reviewer distinct from whoever corrected it, not a correction form with no documented second reviewer of its own. Keito drafts a time entry from the shift worked, the caregiver confirms it, and a separate reviewer settles payroll and billing status before the hours become evidence. The boundary is deliberate: Keito has no scheduling, billing, EVV, or clinical-documentation tools, and it claims no native AxisCare integration, automatic import, or synchronisation. AxisCare keeps running the agency; Keito is where corrected hours get an independent, second review.
Choose AxisCare when the agency needs scheduling, payer billing, electronic visit verification, and — for skilled services — clinical documentation running from one platform
Choose Keito when the problem is that AxisCare’s EVV Correction Form has no documented reviewer distinct from whoever makes the correction
Prove it in one pay period: Keito runs alongside AxisCare, reviewing hours without touching scheduling, billing, or EVV
Workflow fit
Keito keeps AxisCare alternative connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Choose AxisCare when the agency needs scheduling, payer billing, electronic visit verification, and — for skilled services — clinical documentation running from one platform
Choose Keito when the problem is that AxisCare’s EVV Correction Form has no documented reviewer distinct from whoever makes the correction
Prove it in one pay period: Keito runs alongside AxisCare, reviewing hours without touching scheduling, billing, or EVV
Keito drafts a time entry from the shift a caregiver worked; they confirm and correct it instead of routing a change through a correction form with no documented second reviewer.
AxisCare locks a caregiver’s clocked visit time once recorded and routes any change through a separate EVV Correction Form — but reviewed documentation does not describe a required reason or a reviewer distinct from whoever completes it; Keito’s reviewer settles payroll and billing status for every entry before the period closes.
Reviewers approve caregiver hours and hand the evidence to payroll and billing for labor-cost and payer review, through exports the team designs and tests itself.
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
Product shape
A standalone workspace for reviewed, payroll-ready hours and labor-cost evidence.
AxisCare publishes home care software — scheduling, payer billing, electronic visit verification, and (via Skilled Care) clinical documentation, all in one platform.
How time is captured
AI drafts a shift-specific entry from the visit worked; the caregiver confirms it, and a separate reviewer approves before it becomes a paycheck or a bill.
AxisCare’s mobile app clocks a visit in and out by GPS and telephony, and locks that recorded time — a caregiver cannot change it in the app once clocked.
Correction and review
Every reviewed hour carries a reviewer, an approval state, and a reasoned record of any change, tracked from the first draft.
AxisCare routes changes through a separate EVV Correction Form described as covering when, why, and how to correct a record — but reviewed documentation does not describe a required reason or a reviewer distinct from whoever completes it.
Review before payroll and billing
A reviewer distinct from the caregiver settles payroll and billing status per entry before the period closes.
Reviewed AxisCare documentation covers visit-verification statuses, rejected-claim tracking, and payroll exports, but does not describe a required second reviewer before a corrected visit’s hours are used for pay or a bill.
Pricing and adoption
Published flat team pricing and a setup measured in days, run alongside AxisCare.
AxisCare pricing is quote-based, described as flexible and dependent on agency size and client count, with billing, EVV, scheduling, and the mobile app included in the base price.
Data movement
Team-designed, tested exports and API handoffs moved in deliberate stages.
AxisCare’s own documentation describes sending EVV-compliant visit information directly to Medicaid, VA, LTCi, and other payers; connecting corrected-hours data to outside payroll tools is not an assumed automatic sync with Keito.
It is software a home care agency adopts instead of, or alongside, AxisCare, which runs scheduling, payer billing, and electronic visit verification. Because AxisCare already covers that much of running an agency, an alternative rarely replaces all of it at once. Keito is the alternative for the review gap behind AxisCare’s EVV Correction Form: AI-drafted entries a caregiver confirms, approved by a separate reviewer before those hours become a paycheck or a bill.
It does both. AxisCare’s mobile caregiver app captures clock-in and clock-out time using GPS and telephony verification, and AxisCare’s own mobile-app tutorial states that once a caregiver clocks in or out, that time cannot be changed in the app. Changes go through a separate EVV Correction Form, but AxisCare’s own documentation does not describe who reviews or approves that correction before payroll or billing.
The gap is a reviewer for corrections, not visit capture itself. AxisCare already locks a caregiver’s clocked time and provides an EVV Correction Form for changing it, but its own documentation does not describe a reviewer distinct from whoever completes that correction. Keito adds that layer: it drafts a time entry from the visit worked, the caregiver confirms it, and a separate reviewer settles payroll and billing status before the hours become evidence. AxisCare still owns scheduling, payer billing, and electronic visit verification; Keito owns the independently reviewed hours record.
Choose AxisCare when the agency needs scheduling, payer billing, electronic visit verification, and — for skilled services — clinical documentation running from one platform, sold to private-duty, Medicaid, VA, and skilled home care agencies. Keito does not reproduce any of it: no scheduling, no payer billing, no EVV, no clinical documentation. It is the wrong choice if the immediate need is home care agency management or visit-verification software rather than an independently reviewed record of caregiver hours.
Each reviewed record keeps the caregiver, client, shift, duration, description, payroll status, reviewer, approval state, and pay period, tied to the specific visit worked rather than a correction-form entry with no documented second reviewer. That package backs the payroll run and the payer bill, and gives an office manager a reviewed answer when a caregiver’s hours are questioned.
No. Keito claims no native AxisCare integration, automatic import, or two-way synchronisation — AxisCare’s own scheduling, payer billing, electronic visit verification, and EVV Correction Form workflow belong to its platform, not Keito’s. Capture in Keito is its own workflow: AI-drafted, typed, timed, and manually entered records that pass review before becoming payroll or billing evidence. An agency can keep AxisCare for scheduling, billing, and EVV and run Keito alongside it as the independent review layer for corrected caregiver hours, with any transfer between them designed and tested by the team.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac, Windows, and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Flat workspace price for 1 licensed user
Team collaboration
For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.
Flat workspace price with no per-user fees
Advanced operations
For organizations that need integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
Flat workspace price with no per-user fees
Optional Business add-on: Microsoft Entra SSO.
View add-on and pricingAI agents do not require licenses on any plan.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.
