Housecall Pro runs day-to-day home-service operations: scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, payments, and customer communication. Its Timesheet app lets a manager open a technician’s clock-in and clock-out fields and edit them directly, mark time paid or unpaid, and set the hour type — and any adjustment is logged under an Edit History section with an optional note field. What Housecall Pro’s own documentation does not describe is a required reason for that edit, or an approval status distinct from the same person who made the change. Keito is the layer in between: AI-drafted time entries a technician confirms, reviewed and approved by someone else, before the hours become a paycheck.
Illustrative review queue
Illustrative pay period
Hours reviewed
Entries confirmed
64
Technicians reviewed
12
Jobs covered
37
Hours tied to each job
Technician, job, and travel time on every entry
Reviewed before payroll runs
A separate reviewer confirms hours before the batch closes
Evidence behind payroll
Reviewed hours back the payroll run
Housecall Pro timestamps job and travel time automatically when a technician taps On My Way, Start, or Finish in the mobile app, and a manager can open the Timesheet app to view and edit any shift directly — clicking into the In or Out fields, adding a new entry, marking time Paid or Unpaid, and setting the hour type (regular, overtime, double time). Housecall Pro’s own documentation confirms that adjustments to total travel or job time appear under an Edit History section, and that a manager can optionally add a note explaining the change. It does not describe a required reason for the edit, or an approval status distinct from the same manager who made it. Keito answers the question that leaves open: did a reviewer distinct from whoever can edit the timesheet actually confirm each technician’s hours before they became a paycheck.
Set up technicians, managers, and reviewers in Keito in days — Housecall Pro keeps running scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, and payments exactly as it does today.
Keito drafts a time entry from the job and travel time logged, so technicians confirm hours instead of routing edits through a Timesheet app where the same manager can both edit and mark time paid with no documented second approver.
A separate reviewer approves payroll status before the period closes, then hands the approved hours to payroll as evidence.
Timesheet editing inside field-service software, not an independent payroll gate
Housecall Pro is published as home-service business software: scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, payments, and customer communication for plumbing, HVAC, electrical, and cleaning companies. Its Timesheet app — reachable from the same account a technician clocks in from — lets a manager click directly into a shift’s In or Out time, edit it, add a new entry, mark the shift Paid or Unpaid, and choose an hour type, before syncing reviewed totals to payroll. Housecall Pro’s own documentation confirms those edits are tracked in an Edit History section and that a manager can optionally add a note explaining an adjustment. What it does not describe is a required reason for the edit, or a review step performed by someone other than the manager who made the change. Keito’s argument is not that home-service businesses need a new scheduling, dispatch, quoting, or invoicing platform — Housecall Pro already publishes all of that, and Keito makes no claim to job scheduling, dispatch, quoting, or payment processing. It is that the hours behind a paycheck deserve a reviewer distinct from whoever can edit them, not an edit-history log with an optional note and no documented second approver. Keito drafts a time entry from the job worked, the technician confirms it, and a separate reviewer settles payroll status before the hours become evidence. The boundary is deliberate: Keito has no scheduling, dispatch, quoting, or invoicing tools, and it claims no native Housecall Pro integration, automatic import, or synchronisation. Housecall Pro keeps running the business; Keito is where the hours behind it get an independent, second review.
Choose Housecall Pro when the business needs scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, payments, and customer communication running from one platform
Choose Keito when the problem is that Housecall Pro’s Timesheet app logs edits with an optional note but no documented required reason or second approver
Prove it in one pay period: Keito runs alongside Housecall Pro, reviewing hours without touching scheduling, dispatch, or invoicing
Workflow fit
Keito keeps Housecall Pro alternative connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Choose Housecall Pro when the business needs scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, payments, and customer communication running from one platform
Choose Keito when the problem is that Housecall Pro’s Timesheet app logs edits with an optional note but no documented required reason or second approver
Prove it in one pay period: Keito runs alongside Housecall Pro, reviewing hours without touching scheduling, dispatch, or invoicing
Keito drafts a time entry from the job a technician worked; they confirm and correct it instead of routing hours through a Timesheet app where a manager can edit clock times directly with only an optional note and no documented second reviewer.
Housecall Pro lets a manager edit In/Out times, mark shifts Paid or Unpaid, and set hour type, logging the change under Edit History with an optional note — but reviewed documentation does not describe a required reason or a second approver distinct from that same manager; Keito’s reviewer settles payroll status for every entry before the period closes.
Reviewers approve technician hours and hand the evidence to payroll for labor-cost review, through exports the team designs and tests itself.
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
Product shape
A standalone workspace for reviewed, payroll-ready hours and labor-cost evidence.
Housecall Pro publishes home-service business software — scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, payments, and customer communication, all in one platform.
How time is captured
AI drafts a job-specific entry from the schedule worked; the technician confirms it, and a separate reviewer approves before it becomes a paycheck.
Housecall Pro timestamps job and travel time from On My Way, Start, and Finish taps, and a manager can also add or edit entries directly in the Timesheet app.
Editing and approval
Every reviewed hour carries a reviewer, an approval state, and a reasoned record of any change, tracked from the first draft.
Housecall Pro’s documentation describes a manager editing In/Out times and hour type, with an optional note and an Edit History log — but reviewed documentation does not describe a required reason or a second approver distinct from that same manager.
Review before payroll
A reviewer distinct from the technician settles payroll status per entry before the period closes.
Reviewed Housecall Pro documentation covers Paid/Unpaid marking, hour-type selection, and syncing hours to payroll, but does not describe a required second reviewer before recorded hours are used for pay.
Pricing and adoption
Published flat team pricing and a setup measured in days, run alongside Housecall Pro.
Housecall Pro publishes tiered plan pricing that scales with plan and technician count, separate from any payroll-review workflow.
Data movement
Team-designed, tested exports and API handoffs moved in deliberate stages.
Housecall Pro’s own documentation describes syncing reviewed timesheet totals to its own payroll flow; connecting Timesheet data to outside payroll tools is not an assumed automatic sync with Keito.
It is software a home-service business adopts instead of, or alongside, Housecall Pro, which runs scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, payments, and customer communication. Because Housecall Pro already covers that much of running the business, an alternative rarely replaces all of it at once. Keito is the alternative for the review gap behind Housecall Pro’s Timesheet app: AI-drafted entries a technician confirms, approved by a separate reviewer before those hours become a paycheck.
It does both. Housecall Pro timestamps job and travel time automatically when a technician taps On My Way, Start, or Finish in the mobile app, and a manager can open the Timesheet app to view totals, add entries, and edit any shift’s clock-in or clock-out time directly. Housecall Pro’s own documentation confirms those edits are logged under an Edit History section with an optional note, but does not describe a required reason or a second approver distinct from the same manager who made the edit.
The gap is a second, independent approver, not time tracking itself. Housecall Pro already timestamps job and travel time and lets a manager edit entries directly, but its own documentation does not describe a reviewer distinct from that same manager. Keito adds that layer: it drafts a time entry from the job worked, the technician confirms it, and a separate reviewer settles payroll status before the hours become evidence. Housecall Pro still owns scheduling, dispatch, quoting, and invoicing; Keito owns the independently reviewed hours record.
Choose Housecall Pro when the business needs scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, payments, and customer communication running from one platform — it already covers all of that for plumbing, HVAC, electrical, and cleaning companies. Keito does not reproduce any of it: no scheduling, no dispatch, no quoting, no invoicing. It is the wrong choice if the immediate need is field-service management software rather than an independently reviewed record of technician hours.
Each reviewed record keeps the technician, job, travel time, description, payroll status, reviewer, approval state, and pay period, tied to the specific job worked rather than a Timesheet entry a manager could edit directly with only an optional note and no documented second reviewer. That package backs the payroll run and gives an office manager a reviewed answer when hours are questioned.
No. Keito claims no native Housecall Pro integration, automatic import, or two-way synchronisation — Housecall Pro’s own scheduling, dispatch, quoting, invoicing, and Timesheet workflow belong to its platform, not Keito’s. Capture in Keito is its own workflow: AI-drafted, typed, timed, and manually entered records that pass review before becoming payroll evidence. A business can keep Housecall Pro for scheduling, dispatch, and invoicing and run Keito alongside it as the independent second-review layer for technician hours, with any transfer between them designed and tested by the team.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac, Windows, and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Flat workspace price for 1 licensed user
Team collaboration
For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.
Flat workspace price with no per-user fees
Advanced operations
For organizations that need integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
Flat workspace price with no per-user fees
Optional Business add-on: Microsoft Entra SSO.
View add-on and pricingAI agents do not require licenses on any plan.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.
