AI coding assistants accelerate delivery but add real costs. When those tools run on client work, the cost belongs in the billing record. Keito lets engineering teams attribute AI pair programming spend to the client project, review it alongside human time, and include it in client summaries.
Cost review
AI coding costs
$2.4k/mo
Active work
24
Reviewed
91%
Ready to bill
$18.4k
Time captured with context
ai pair programming cost tracking
Billing review complete
Client and project checked
Invoice evidence ready
Approved summary prepared
ai pair programming cost tracking needs more than a timer. The billing record has to keep client, project, approval, and invoice context together before the work reaches finance.
Record token fees, subscription usage, and compute costs against the client project they serve as the agents run — not reconstructed at billing time from company card statements.
Combine AI agent cost records with human billable hours in one review so the total delivery effort is visible before the invoice cycle starts.
Use reviewed human and agent cost data to prepare client summaries and invoice backup that reflect how the work was actually delivered.
AI coding cost attribution
Engineering teams adopting AI pair programming tools like Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Claude Code face a new billing question: these tools have real costs — subscription fees, usage-based API charges, compute overhead — and when an engineer uses them on client work, those costs belong in the billing record. The challenge is attribution. A Cursor Pro subscription is a flat monthly charge, but the benefit is not evenly distributed across all clients. An engineer might use 80% of their AI pair programming capacity on one client engagement and 20% on another in the same month. Without tracking which client hours involved AI assistance, the cost cannot be attributed and the billing record understates the true cost of delivery. Keito provides a cost attribution layer: engineers can flag time entries as AI-assisted, link them to the AI tool used, and include AI usage costs in the project billing summary. This gives billing managers the data to decide whether AI costs are absorbed, passed through at cost, or built into the rate — without guessing.
Flag time entries as AI-assisted and attribute costs to the client project
Track Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code costs alongside human development time
Include AI coding costs in billing summaries for transparent client invoicing
Workflow fit
Keito keeps ai pair programming cost tracking connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Flag time entries as AI-assisted and attribute costs to the client project
Track Cursor, Copilot, and Claude Code costs alongside human development time
Include AI coding costs in billing summaries for transparent client invoicing
Keito tracks AI agent costs against the same client and project structure as human billable hours so agent spend is never invisible overhead. Agent sessions land as source-tagged time entries via the CLI, API, or Agent Skill, with LLM token costs logged as expenses.
See total delivery cost — human hours and AI agent costs together — by client and project so pricing, margins, and billing decisions reflect the real cost of work.
Keito flat pricing means adding AI tracking capacity to the billing workflow does not create a per-seat cost spike as more people and more agents are involved in delivery.
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
AI coding cost attribution
Keito keeps ai pair programming cost tracking tied to clients, projects, billable status, approvals, and billing summaries in one workspace.
Typical setups capture time in one tool and rebuild the billing explanation later from exports, comments, or spreadsheet cleanup.
Review before invoicing
Managers review entries before they become invoice evidence, so missing context is fixed internally rather than during a client dispute.
Raw timer exports usually reach finance before delivery leads have confirmed whether the work is billable, complete, or client-ready.
Predictable team pricing
Flat-rate plans let delivery staff, reviewers, contractors, and finance users participate without per-seat pricing friction.
Per-seat time trackers make teams choose between clean billing participation and controlling tool spend.
Use a workspace where time is captured against the right client and project, reviewed before invoicing, and exported as billing evidence. Keito is built around that workflow, so ai pair programming cost tracking is not separated from the approval and invoice context it needs.
Yes. Keito tracks work by client, project, person, billable status, and review state, then turns approved records into client-ready summaries. That makes it useful when ai pair programming cost tracking needs to support billing, profitability, and client reporting rather than just attendance.
A generic timer records duration. Keito records billable context: who did the work, which client and project it belongs to, whether it has been reviewed, and how it should appear in billing evidence.
Solo is built for one human owner and unlimited AI agents. Pro adds human teammates. Business adds integrations, exports, and online invoice payments.
One human owner
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Team collaboration
For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.
Advanced operations
For organizations that need integrations, exports, online payments, and stronger controls.
AI agents do not count as human seats on any plan.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Stripe payments, exports, Xero, and QuickBooks are on Business.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.