Attribute Vertex AI spend to the client work that caused it.
Google Cloud bills Vertex AI usage in aggregate. Keito attributes that model spend to client, project, and agent so AI inference cost becomes a defensible billing line instead of an unexplained cloud total.
vertex ai cost tracking needs more than a timer. The billing record has to keep client, project, approval, and invoice context together before the work reaches finance.
Capture AI agent costs as they happen
Record token fees, subscription usage, and compute costs against the client project they serve as the agents run — not reconstructed at billing time from company card statements.
Review agent costs alongside human time
Combine AI agent cost records with human billable hours in one review so the total delivery effort is visible before the invoice cycle starts.
Produce billing evidence that covers every delivery resource
Use reviewed human and agent cost data to prepare client summaries and invoice backup that reflect how the work was actually delivered.
02
Vertex AI cost attribution
Turn aggregate Vertex AI usage into per-client AI cost evidence
Google Vertex AI gives teams a managed way to run Gemini and other foundation models in production, and agencies are increasingly building client AI features on it. The billing gap is the same one every cloud AI platform creates: Vertex AI usage lands in Google Cloud billing as aggregate model and token spend across the project or account, with no native breakdown by the client, engagement, or agent that generated it. For a services firm running AI workflows for multiple clients, that aggregate figure cannot be billed or assessed for margin. When a client asks what the AI line on their invoice represents, or when a delivery lead wants to know whether an AI feature is actually profitable, there is no link between Vertex AI spend and the work behind it. Keito supplies that link. Vertex AI model usage is attributed to client, project, and agent alongside the human billable hours for the same engagement, so AI cost lives in the same reviewed billing record as everything else. Costs are reviewed before client reporting, marked up or passed through per the engagement terms, and explained in client-readable summaries. Each client sees the Vertex AI spend their work generated rather than an opaque Google Cloud total, and the agency sees AI margin per engagement instead of guessing.
Attribute Vertex AI inference and token spend to client, project, and agent
Review AI cost alongside billable hours before client reporting
Turn an aggregate Google Cloud total into per-client AI cost lines
Workflow fit
Aggregate cloud bill vs per-client attribution
Keito keeps vertex ai cost tracking connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Attribute Vertex AI inference and token spend to client, project, and agent
Review AI cost alongside billable hours before client reporting
Turn an aggregate Google Cloud total into per-client AI cost lines
03
What Keito adds to vertex ai cost tracking
Per-client AI cost attribution
Keito tracks AI agent costs against the same client and project structure as human billable hours so agent spend is never invisible overhead. Agent sessions land as source-tagged time entries via the CLI, API, or Agent Skill, with LLM token costs logged as expenses.
Token and subscription cost capture
Client and project attribution
Reviewable alongside human time
Combined human and agent billing view
See total delivery cost — human hours and AI agent costs together — by client and project so pricing, margins, and billing decisions reflect the real cost of work.
Human + AI cost in one workspace
Project-level margin context
Combined billing evidence
Flat pricing for AI-augmented teams
Keito flat pricing means adding AI tracking capacity to the billing workflow does not create a per-seat cost spike as more people and more agents are involved in delivery.
No per-user escalation
Room for AI and human contributors
Predictable monthly tool cost
04
Compare the workflow
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
AreaKeitoTypical setup
Aggregate cloud bill vs per-client attribution
Keito keeps vertex ai cost tracking tied to clients, projects, billable status, approvals, and billing summaries in one workspace.
Typical setups capture time in one tool and rebuild the billing explanation later from exports, comments, or spreadsheet cleanup.
Review before invoicing
Managers review entries before they become invoice evidence, so missing context is fixed internally rather than during a client dispute.
Raw timer exports usually reach finance before delivery leads have confirmed whether the work is billable, complete, or client-ready.
Predictable team pricing
Flat-rate plans let delivery staff, reviewers, contractors, and finance users participate without per-seat pricing friction.
Per-seat time trackers make teams choose between clean billing participation and controlling tool spend.
What is the best way to manage vertex AI cost tracking?
The best way to manage vertex AI cost tracking is to capture work at source, attach it to the right client and project, review it before invoicing, and use the reviewed record as billing evidence. Keito is built around that workflow so time, approvals, and invoice context stay connected.
Can Keito help with vertex AI cost tracking?
Yes. Keito helps with vertex AI cost tracking by tracking work by client, project, task, person, billable status, and review state, then turning approved records into client-ready summaries. That makes the data useful for billing, profitability, and client reporting rather than just attendance.
How is Keito different from a generic timer for vertex AI cost tracking?
Keito is different because it treats time as billing evidence, not just duration. A generic timer records how long something took; Keito records who did the work, where it belongs, whether it was reviewed, and how it should appear in client billing context.
Can vertex AI cost tracking support billing clients for AI work?
Yes, vertex AI cost tracking can support billing clients for AI work when agent sessions, token costs, compute spend, and human review time are attributed to the right client project. Keito keeps AI costs and human time together so teams can explain total delivery effort before invoicing.
What should a client-ready vertex AI cost tracking report include?
A client-ready vertex AI cost tracking report should include the client, project, task, contributor, billable status, approval state, and a concise explanation of the work completed. Keito keeps those details connected so reports can answer client questions without exposing internal delivery noise.
03
Start solo.Add people when you need them.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac desktop and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
Solo
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Exports on every plan
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Build a cleaner billing record for agencies and professional services teams running ai agents and applications on google vertex ai that need to attribute model spend to specific clients and projects for billing and margin.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.