PestPac runs day-to-day pest control operations: scheduling, routing and GPS fleet tracking, billing and field payments, CRM, chemical and termite tracking, custom forms, a customer portal, and reporting. Its mobile app logs technician arrival and job-completion times on every stop, described by PestPac itself as useful for payroll and labor law compliance — but PestPac’s own product pages do not describe a way for a manager or office staff to edit, correct, or approve those logged times before payroll runs. Keito is the layer PestPac does not publish: AI-drafted time entries a technician confirms, reviewed and approved by someone else, with any change reasoned and recorded, before the hours become a paycheck.
Illustrative review queue
Illustrative pay period
Hours reviewed
Entries confirmed
64
Routes covered
9
Technicians reviewed
14
Hours tied to each stop
Technician, route, and job on every entry
Reviewed before payroll runs
A separate reviewer confirms hours before the batch closes
Evidence behind payroll and labor compliance
Reviewed hours back payroll and labor-law recordkeeping
PestPac’s mobile app logs both ends of a service visit — arrival and job completion — on every stop a technician runs, and PestPac itself describes that log as useful for payroll and labor law compliance. What its own product pages do not describe is what happens between the log and the paycheck: a way for a manager or office staff to edit, correct, dispute, or approve a technician’s logged times before payroll runs. Keito answers the question PestPac’s own documentation leaves open: how many hours did a technician actually work, confirmed by them and reviewed by someone else, before those hours became a paycheck.
Set up technicians, routes, and reviewers in Keito in days — PestPac keeps running scheduling, routing, billing, CRM, and chemical and termite tracking exactly as it does today.
Keito drafts a time entry from the route or job a technician worked, so they confirm hours instead of relying on an arrival-and-completion log that PestPac’s own documentation does not describe as a reviewable payroll record.
A separate reviewer approves payroll status before the period closes, then hands the approved hours to payroll as labor-law and job-costing evidence.
An arrival-to-completion log inside pest control software, not a reviewed payroll record
PestPac is published as pest control software covering scheduling and daily appointments, routing and GPS fleet tracking, billing and field payment processing, CRM, chemical and material tracking with inventory auto-deduction, termite and Sentricon device management, custom forms, a customer portal, and reporting, sold across Small Business, Professional, and Enterprise plan tiers with quote-based pricing. Its mobile app logs a technician’s arrival and job-completion time on every stop, and PestPac itself describes that log as useful for payroll and labor law compliance. But PestPac’s own product pages do not describe a way for a manager or office staff to edit, correct, dispute, or approve a technician’s logged times before those hours reach payroll. Keito’s argument is not that pest control companies need a new scheduling, routing, or billing platform — PestPac already publishes all of that. It is that paying technicians by actual hours worked needs a reviewed record PestPac does not publish: an hours entry a technician confirms, reviewed and approved by someone else, with a reason recorded for any change, before those hours become a paycheck. Keito drafts a time entry from the route or job worked, the technician confirms it, and a separate reviewer settles payroll status before the hours become evidence. The boundary is deliberate: Keito has no scheduling, routing, billing, CRM, or chemical and termite tracking, and it claims no native PestPac integration, automatic import, or synchronisation. PestPac keeps running the route; Keito is where the hours behind it get captured and independently reviewed.
Choose PestPac when the company needs scheduling, routing, billing, CRM, and chemical and termite tracking running from one platform
Choose Keito when the problem is that PestPac’s own product pages do not describe a way to edit, correct, or approve technician-logged times before payroll
Prove it in one pay period: Keito runs alongside PestPac, capturing and reviewing technician hours without touching scheduling, routing, or billing
Workflow fit
Keito keeps PestPac alternative connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Choose PestPac when the company needs scheduling, routing, billing, CRM, and chemical and termite tracking running from one platform
Choose Keito when the problem is that PestPac’s own product pages do not describe a way to edit, correct, or approve technician-logged times before payroll
Prove it in one pay period: Keito runs alongside PestPac, capturing and reviewing technician hours without touching scheduling, routing, or billing
Keito drafts a time entry from the route or job a technician worked; they confirm and correct it instead of relying on an arrival-and-completion log that PestPac’s own documentation does not describe as an editable or reviewable payroll record.
PestPac’s mobile app logs arrival and job-completion time and calls that log useful for payroll and labor law compliance, but reviewed first-party documentation does not describe a way to edit, correct, dispute, or approve those times; Keito’s reviewer settles payroll status for every entry, with a reason recorded for any change, before the period closes.
Reviewers approve technician hours and hand the evidence to payroll or into job-costing for route and contract pricing, through exports the team designs and tests itself.
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
Product shape
A standalone workspace for reviewed, payroll-ready technician hours and labor-cost evidence.
PestPac publishes pest control software — scheduling, routing, billing, CRM, chemical and termite tracking, and reporting, sold across Small Business, Professional, and Enterprise plan tiers.
How time is captured
AI drafts a route-specific entry from the stop that happened; the technician confirms it, and a separate reviewer approves before it becomes a labor cost or paycheck.
PestPac’s mobile app logs arrival and job-completion time on every stop and describes that log as useful for payroll and labor law compliance.
Editing and correction
Every reviewed hour carries a reviewer, an approval state, and a reasoned record of any change, tracked from the first draft.
Reviewed PestPac documentation does not describe a way for a manager or office staff to edit, correct, or dispute a technician’s logged arrival or completion time.
Review before payroll
A reviewer distinct from the technician settles payroll status per entry, with any change reasoned and recorded, before the period closes.
Reviewed PestPac documentation describes the arrival-and-completion log itself, but does not describe a manager review or approval step before those hours reach payroll.
Pricing and adoption
Published flat team pricing and a setup measured in days, run alongside PestPac.
PestPac is sold in Small Business, Professional, and Enterprise tiers, priced by quote; exact rates require contacting a PestPac consultant.
Data movement
Team-designed, tested exports and API handoffs moved in deliberate stages.
PestPac’s own documentation does not describe a technician-hours-to-payroll data flow beyond the arrival-and-completion log; connecting reviewed Keito hours to outside payroll tools is not an assumed automatic sync with PestPac.
It is software a pest control company adopts instead of, or alongside, PestPac, which runs scheduling, routing, billing, CRM, and chemical and termite tracking. Because PestPac already covers that much of running the business, an alternative rarely replaces all of it at once. Keito is the alternative for the gap in PestPac’s own documentation: a reviewed technician-hours record, with AI-drafted entries a technician confirms and a separate reviewer approves before those hours become a paycheck.
Yes, PestPac’s mobile app logs a technician’s arrival and job-completion time on every stop, and PestPac itself describes that log as useful for payroll and labor law compliance. What reviewed first-party PestPac product pages do not describe is a way for a manager or office staff to edit, correct, dispute, or approve those logged times before payroll runs. Keito fills that specific gap: AI-drafted time entries a technician confirms, reviewed by someone else, before payroll.
The gap is review, not logging. PestPac already logs arrival and completion time on every stop, but its own documentation does not describe a manager correcting, disputing, or approving those times before they reach payroll. Keito adds that layer: it drafts a time entry from the route or job worked, the technician confirms it, and a separate reviewer settles payroll status, with a reason recorded for any change, before the hours become evidence for a paycheck. PestPac still owns scheduling, routing, billing, and chemical and termite tracking; Keito owns the reviewed-hours record.
Choose PestPac when the company needs scheduling, routing and GPS fleet tracking, billing and field payments, CRM, chemical and termite tracking, and a customer portal running from one platform — it already covers all of that for pest control operations. Keito does not reproduce any of it: no scheduling, no routing, no billing, no chemical or termite tracking. It is the wrong choice if the immediate need is pest control operations software rather than a reviewed record of technician hours worked.
Each reviewed record keeps the technician, route, job, duration, description, payroll status, reviewer, approval state, and pay period, tied to the specific stop a technician worked rather than an arrival-and-completion log that was never described as an editable payroll record. That package backs the payroll run and gives a manager a reviewed answer when a technician’s hours are questioned, or when route hours need to justify recurring contract pricing.
No. Keito claims no native PestPac integration, automatic import, or two-way synchronisation — PestPac’s own scheduling, routing, billing, and chemical and termite tracking belong to its platform, not Keito’s. Capture in Keito is its own workflow: AI-drafted, typed, timed, and manually entered records that pass review before becoming payroll evidence. A company can keep PestPac for scheduling, routing, and billing and run Keito alongside it as the reviewed-hours layer PestPac itself does not publish, with any transfer between them designed and tested by the team.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac, Windows, and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Flat workspace price for 1 licensed user
Team collaboration
For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.
Flat workspace price with no per-user fees
Advanced operations
For organizations that need integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
Flat workspace price with no per-user fees
Optional Business add-on: Microsoft Entra SSO.
View add-on and pricingAI agents do not require licenses on any plan.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.
