Track AI code review spend by the projects it actually accelerates.
AI code review tools cut review time but add subscription and API cost. Keito gives engineering teams a place to attribute that cost to the client projects whose pull requests it accelerated.
AI code review cost tracking needs more than a timer. The billing record has to keep client, project, approval, and invoice context together before the work reaches finance.
Capture AI agent costs as they happen
Record token fees, subscription usage, and compute costs against the client project they serve as the agents run — not reconstructed at billing time from company card statements.
Review agent costs alongside human time
Combine AI agent cost records with human billable hours in one review so the total delivery effort is visible before the invoice cycle starts.
Produce billing evidence that covers every delivery resource
Use reviewed human and agent cost data to prepare client summaries and invoice backup that reflect how the work was actually delivered.
02
Review tool cost attribution
Attribute AI code review tool spend to the projects it accelerates
AI-driven code review tools — CodeRabbit, Greptile, GitHub Copilot review, and others — are reshaping how teams handle pull requests. They flag issues earlier, reduce reviewer fatigue, and shorten merge cycles. They also cost money: per-seat subscriptions, per-PR review charges, and compute overhead. For agencies and consultancies whose pull requests serve specific client projects, those costs belong in the project margin picture and, where the relationship supports it, the billing conversation. Without attribution, the entire AI review subscription becomes overhead that obscures which client engagement is actually benefiting. Keito lets teams log code review activity against client and project, attribute AI review tool costs to the engagement, and surface those costs in margin and billing reviews. The result is a clearer picture of what AI-assisted code review actually costs per client — and a better basis for pricing decisions.
Attribute AI code review subscription and per-PR costs to client projects
Track AI-assisted review activity alongside human review time
Include AI review tool spend in project margin and billing summaries
Workflow fit
AI review cost attribution
Keito keeps AI code review cost tracking connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Attribute AI code review subscription and per-PR costs to client projects
Track AI-assisted review activity alongside human review time
Include AI review tool spend in project margin and billing summaries
03
What Keito adds to AI code review cost tracking
Per-client AI cost attribution
Keito tracks AI agent costs against the same client and project structure as human billable hours so agent spend is never invisible overhead. Agent sessions land as source-tagged time entries via the CLI, API, or Agent Skill, with LLM token costs logged as expenses.
Token and subscription cost capture
Client and project attribution
Reviewable alongside human time
Combined human and agent billing view
See total delivery cost — human hours and AI agent costs together — by client and project so pricing, margins, and billing decisions reflect the real cost of work.
Human + AI cost in one workspace
Project-level margin context
Combined billing evidence
Flat pricing for AI-augmented teams
Keito flat pricing means adding AI tracking capacity to the billing workflow does not create a per-seat cost spike as more people and more agents are involved in delivery.
No per-user escalation
Room for AI and human contributors
Predictable monthly tool cost
04
Compare the workflow
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
AreaKeitoTypical setup
AI review cost attribution
Keito keeps AI code review cost tracking tied to clients, projects, billable status, approvals, and billing summaries in one workspace.
Typical setups capture time in one tool and rebuild the billing explanation later from exports, comments, or spreadsheet cleanup.
Review before invoicing
Managers review entries before they become invoice evidence, so missing context is fixed internally rather than during a client dispute.
Raw timer exports usually reach finance before delivery leads have confirmed whether the work is billable, complete, or client-ready.
Predictable team pricing
Flat-rate plans let delivery staff, reviewers, contractors, and finance users participate without per-seat pricing friction.
Per-seat time trackers make teams choose between clean billing participation and controlling tool spend.
What is the best way to manage AI code review cost tracking?
The best way to manage AI code review cost tracking is to capture work at source, attach it to the right client and project, review it before invoicing, and use the reviewed record as billing evidence. Keito is built around that workflow so time, approvals, and invoice context stay connected.
Can Keito help with AI code review cost tracking?
Yes. Keito helps with AI code review cost tracking by tracking work by client, project, task, person, billable status, and review state, then turning approved records into client-ready summaries. That makes the data useful for billing, profitability, and client reporting rather than just attendance.
How is Keito different from a generic timer for AI code review cost tracking?
Keito is different because it treats time as billing evidence, not just duration. A generic timer records how long something took; Keito records who did the work, where it belongs, whether it was reviewed, and how it should appear in client billing context.
Can AI code review cost tracking support billing clients for AI work?
Yes, AI code review cost tracking can support billing clients for AI work when agent sessions, token costs, compute spend, and human review time are attributed to the right client project. Keito keeps AI costs and human time together so teams can explain total delivery effort before invoicing.
What should a client-ready AI code review cost tracking report include?
A client-ready AI code review cost tracking report should include the client, project, task, contributor, billable status, approval state, and a concise explanation of the work completed. Keito keeps those details connected so reports can answer client questions without exposing internal delivery noise.
03
Start solo.Add people when you need them.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac desktop and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
Solo
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Exports on every plan
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Build a cleaner billing record for engineering teams and software consultancies using ai code review tools on client projects who need cost attribution for billing and margin reviews.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.