Keito gives accounting firms a focused record for client time, approvals, AI-assisted delivery costs, and invoice evidence when the billing workflow needs a narrower layer than a full practice-management platform.
Illustrative period review
Illustrative billing state
Approved
Recorded work
132h
Review items
6
Ready
92%
Client work captured
Engagement and service context
Billing exceptions resolved
Descriptions and scope reviewed
Invoice evidence approved
Firm-governed downstream handoff
Canopy already documents timers, time entries, work-in-progress views, invoicing, and payment collection inside its practice-management platform. Keito is the narrower choice for firms that want reviewed human and AI-assisted work to become billing evidence in one focused workspace, with explicit boundaries around any transfer.
Agree the clients, engagements, services, contributors, billable rules, reviewers, and billing periods that move to Keito before touching live time capture or any records the firm keeps in Canopy.
Resolve missing descriptions, wrong service context, non-billable entries, scope changes, AI-assisted delivery costs, and write-off questions while the engagement team can still explain the work.
Use approved time and decision context for client summaries, invoice preparation, or a firm-governed downstream workflow without assuming automatic Canopy import, synchronisation, or reconciliation.
Compare operating scope, not just timers
Canopy's official product and support material documents built-in timers, time entries, work-in-progress and saved-time views, progress billing, branded invoices, payment collection, and firm reporting inside a broader practice-management platform that also spans client management, documents, and workflow. Buyers should evaluate it as an established all-in-one system, not as a product that lacks time or billing capability. Keito answers a narrower question. It keeps professional time, approved AI-agent or model costs, client and engagement context, billable status, descriptions, approvals, scope decisions, and invoice evidence in one focused review workflow. That fits a firm whose delivery and finance reviewers want a single clear source record, whose AI-assisted or technical work needs to sit beside professional time, or whose pricing preference favours a flat team rate over per-user licensing. The boundary matters: Keito does not claim to reproduce Canopy's wider client-portal, document, workflow, tax-resolution, proposal, or payment-processing capabilities. It does not claim a native Canopy integration, automatic historical import, two-way synchronisation, payment migration, automatic invoice reconciliation, or a lossless switch. Before changing live work, the firm should decide which system owns clients, engagements, time, invoices, payments, and accounting records; test representative exports or API handoffs; preserve historical evidence; and approve rollback and reconciliation controls.
Choose Canopy when the firm wants time, billing, invoicing, payments, and wider practice management to stay in one platform
Choose Keito when the priority is a focused reviewed record for human and AI-assisted client work, billing evidence, and flat-rate team participation
Map system ownership, historical records, transfer controls, invoice evidence, and rollback steps before changing the live process
Workflow fit
Keito keeps Canopy time tracking alternative connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Choose Canopy when the firm wants time, billing, invoicing, payments, and wider practice management to stay in one platform
Choose Keito when the priority is a focused reviewed record for human and AI-assisted client work, billing evidence, and flat-rate team participation
Map system ownership, historical records, transfer controls, invoice evidence, and rollback steps before changing the live process
Keep client, engagement, service, contributor, duration, billable status, work explanation, and approval state together before finance uses the record for billing or reporting.
Record staff time and approved AI-agent or model costs against the same client project so reviewers assess one delivery record, without implying automatic activity ingestion from Canopy or any other tool.
Move active capture and review in controlled stages, retain historical source evidence, and validate exports or API-based handoffs rather than expecting a one-click Canopy migration that Keito does not provide.
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
Primary product scope
Keito focuses on reviewed human and AI-assisted work, billing context, client evidence, and project economics.
Canopy documents time tracking, work-in-progress views, progress billing, invoicing, payment collection, and a wider practice-management workflow.
Billing review record
Engagement leads resolve descriptions, scope decisions, billable status, AI-assisted costs, and approval exceptions before records become invoice evidence.
Buyers should verify how Canopy's current time, WIP, invoicing, payment, and reporting controls match the firm's exact review process.
Team participation
Flat-rate team plans let staff, partners, contractors, and billing reviewers share the Keito workflow without a separate charge for every participant.
Firms should compare current per-user pricing and module choices for every person who must capture, review, report, administer, or approve work.
Migration boundary
Keito supports a staged, firm-controlled move of active capture and review with explicit exports and handoffs.
No native Canopy import, two-way synchronisation, payment migration, or automatic invoice reconciliation is assumed.
A Canopy time tracking alternative is a different system for capturing, reviewing, and using professional work in client billing. Keito is a focused option for firms that want approved human and AI-assisted work, invoice evidence, and project context without adopting or keeping a full practice-management platform for that layer.
Firms should compare client and engagement structure, time capture, work-in-progress review, approvals, invoicing, payment ownership, reporting, AI-assisted work, migration controls, integrations, and total team cost. Canopy spans practice management with built-in time, billing, and payments, while Keito concentrates on the reviewed delivery record behind billing.
A firm should keep Canopy when it wants time, billing, invoicing, payment collection, client portals, documents, and workflow to remain inside one practice-management platform. Keito suits a narrower reviewed time, approval, AI-cost, and invoice-evidence workflow, so it should not be treated as feature-for-feature replacement parity.
Yes, a firm can migrate the active capture and review process in stages, but Keito does not promise a one-click or lossless Canopy migration. The firm should map clients, engagements, services, people, billable rules, open work, historical evidence, reviewers, billing cutoffs, exports, and rollback steps before changing live capture.
A Canopy migration should preserve the client, engagement, service, contributor, duration, billable status, description, rate context, reviewer, approval state, scope or write-off decision, invoice reference, reporting period, and transfer status. Keito keeps new reviewed records traceable while the firm retains historical source evidence under its own retention policy.
No native Canopy integration or automatic synchronisation is claimed. Keito supports structured capture, review, reporting, exports, API, CLI, and agent-friendly options, but each firm must design, test, approve, and monitor any transfer between Keito, Canopy, its invoice process, payment systems, and general ledger.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac desktop and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Team collaboration
For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.
Advanced operations
For organizations that need integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
AI agents do not require licenses on any plan.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.