Clio time tracking alternative

A Clio time tracking alternative built around billable-hour evidence.

Keito gives law firms and legal consultancies one reviewed record for billable time, write-down decisions, AI-assisted delivery costs, and invoice evidence when the firm wants its billing record in a focused workspace rather than inside a full practice management platform.

Focused
Time, review, and invoice evidence
One place
Billing record before the invoice leaves the firm
Staged
Firm-owned migration boundaries
app.keito.ai / legal-billing-review

Illustrative pre-bill review

Example law practice

Illustrative billing state

Reviewed

Recorded work

96h

Review items

5

Ready

92%

Billable time captured

Client and matter context

Example

Write-down decisions resolved

Billable status confirmed before the bill

Example

Invoice evidence approved

Firm-governed downstream handoff

Example
01

Built around the work before the invoice

Clio already publishes a broad practice platform: matter and client management, documents, intake, time and expense tracking, hourly, flat-fee, and contingency billing, invoicing, online payments, and trust account management, on per-user plans. Keito answers a narrower question: it keeps reviewed human and AI-assisted client work, billing decisions, and invoice evidence together in one focused workspace before any invoice or accounting handoff.

Agree what moves and what stays

Decide the clients, matters, contributors, billable rules, reviewers, and billing periods Keito will own before touching live time capture — and keep matter files, documents, intake, payments, and any trust or retainer accounting in the firm’s practice management and accounting stack.

Review billable time before it becomes a bill

Resolve vague descriptions, wrong client or matter context, non-billable entries, rate questions, AI-assisted delivery costs, and write-down decisions while the fee earner can still explain what happened.

Hand off approved invoice evidence

Use approved time and decision context for pre-bills, client summaries, invoice preparation, or a firm-governed downstream workflow without assuming automatic Clio import, synchronisation, or reconciliation.

02

Compare operating scope, not just time capture

Decide between a practice-first platform and a focused reviewed billing record.

Clio is practice-first legal software. Its published scope covers matter and client management, document management, client intake, time and expense tracking on every published plan, hourly, flat-fee, and contingency billing, invoicing, online payments, trust account management, accounting integrations, and a large integration directory, with published per-user monthly pricing across its plan tiers. Buyers should evaluate it as an active, widely adopted platform, not as software that lacks time tracking or billing. Keito answers a narrower question. It keeps billable time, approved AI-agent or model costs, client and matter context, billable status, descriptions, write-down decisions, approvals, and invoice evidence in one focused review workflow, so the record behind every bill is settled before the invoice leaves the firm. That fits a firm or legal consultancy whose billing reviewers want a single clear source record on flat team pricing, or whose AI-assisted research, drafting, or technical work needs to sit beside fee-earner time in the same delivery record. The boundary matters: Keito is not legal practice management software. It does not claim to reproduce Clio’s matter management, document management, client intake, court filing, online payments, or trust accounting capabilities, and it does not claim a native Clio integration, automatic historical import, two-way synchronisation, or a lossless switch. Before changing live work, the firm should decide which system owns clients, matters, time, invoices, payments, and trust records; test representative exports or API handoffs; preserve historical evidence; and approve rollback and reconciliation controls.

Choose Clio when the firm wants matters, documents, intake, time, billing, payments, and trust accounting managed inside one practice platform

Choose Keito when the priority is a focused reviewed record for human and AI-assisted client work, billing decisions, and invoice evidence in one place

Map system ownership, historical records, transfer controls, invoice evidence, and rollback steps before changing the live process

Workflow fit

Primary product scope

Keito keeps Clio time tracking alternative connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.

Choose Clio when the firm wants matters, documents, intake, time, billing, payments, and trust accounting managed inside one practice platform

Choose Keito when the priority is a focused reviewed record for human and AI-assisted client work, billing decisions, and invoice evidence in one place

Map system ownership, historical records, transfer controls, invoice evidence, and rollback steps before changing the live process

03

What Keito adds to Clio time tracking alternative

A connected record behind every bill

Keep client, matter, contributor, duration, billable status, work explanation, and approval state together before the firm uses the record for pre-bills, invoicing, or reporting.

  • Client and matter structure
  • Billable and non-billable classification
  • Review ownership and exception context

Fee-earner time beside AI-assisted costs

Record billable hours and approved AI-agent or model costs against the same client matter so reviewers assess one delivery record, without implying automatic activity ingestion from Clio or any other tool.

  • Human time beside approved AI costs
  • Client and matter attribution
  • API, CLI, and agent-friendly capture options

A staged migration with named boundaries

Move active capture and review in controlled stages, retain historical source evidence, and validate exports or API-based handoffs rather than expecting a one-click Clio migration that Keito does not provide.

  • Pilot representative matters first
  • Reconcile complete billing periods
  • No implied native Clio synchronisation
04

Compare the workflow

The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.

AreaKeitoTypical setup

Primary product scope

Keito focuses on reviewed human and AI-assisted work, billing context, client evidence, and project economics in one workspace.

Clio publishes a practice-first platform: matter and client management, documents, intake, time and expense tracking, billing, invoicing, online payments, and trust account management.

Billing review record

Billing reviewers resolve descriptions, write-down decisions, billable status, AI-assisted costs, and approval exceptions before records become invoice evidence.

Clio’s published billing covers hourly, flat-fee, and contingency work with invoicing and payments in the platform, so buyers should verify how their own pre-bill review and write-down workflow fits their plan tier.

Team participation

Flat-rate team plans let fee earners, partners, paralegals, contractors, and billing reviewers share the Keito workflow, with AI-assisted delivery costs recorded beside billable time.

Clio publishes per-user monthly pricing across its plan tiers, so firms should compare current plan tiers, included features, and total seat cost for everyone who touches billable time.

Migration boundary

Keito supports a staged, firm-controlled move of active capture and review with explicit exports and handoffs.

No native Clio import, two-way synchronisation, or automatic invoice reconciliation is assumed.

05

Related solution pages

06

Useful reading

Frequently asked questions

What is a Clio time tracking alternative?

A Clio time tracking alternative is a different system for capturing, reviewing, and using billable time in client billing. Keito is a focused option for firms that want fee-earner time, approved AI-assisted work costs, write-down decisions, and invoice evidence reviewed in one workspace, rather than managed inside a full practice management platform.

How should law firms compare Clio with Keito?

Firms should compare client and matter structure, time capture, rate handling, write-down and exception review, approvals, invoice evidence, reporting, AI-assisted work, migration controls, integrations, and total plan cost. Clio combines practice management, time and expense tracking, billing, invoicing, payments, and trust accounting on per-user plans, while Keito concentrates on the reviewed delivery record behind billing itself on flat team pricing.

When should a firm keep Clio instead of moving to Keito?

A firm should keep Clio when its priority is matters, documents, client intake, billing, online payments, and trust accounting managed inside one practice platform. Keito suits a narrower reviewed time, approval, AI-cost, and invoice-evidence workflow, so it should not be treated as feature-for-feature replacement parity with a practice management suite.

Can a law firm migrate time tracking from Clio to Keito?

Yes, a firm can migrate the active capture and review process in stages, but Keito does not promise a one-click or lossless Clio migration. The firm should map clients, matters, people, billable rates, open work, historical evidence, reviewers, billing cutoffs, exports, and rollback steps before changing live capture, and keep historical records available under its own retention policy.

What billing and reporting evidence should a Clio migration preserve?

A Clio migration should preserve the client, matter, contributor, duration, billable status, description, rate context, reviewer, approval state, write-down decision, invoice reference, and billing period. Trust and retainer accounting records stay in the firm’s practice management and accounting stack, and Keito keeps new reviewed records traceable while the firm retains historical source evidence.

Does Keito natively integrate or automatically sync with Clio?

No native Clio integration, automatic import, or automatic synchronisation is claimed. Keito supports structured capture, review, reporting, exports, API, CLI, and agent-friendly options, but each firm must design, test, approve, and monitor any transfer between Keito, Clio, its invoice process, and its accounting system. Firms that keep Clio for case management can still run Keito alongside it for billing-accuracy time capture.

03

Start solo.Add people when you need them.

Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac desktop and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.

Solo

1 licensed user

For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.

$19USD /mo

Start Solo
1 licensed user
Unlimited AI agents
Mac desktop and iOS apps
API access and API keys
Time, expenses, projects, and invoices
Stripe invoice payments
CSV and Excel data export
Most popular

Pro

Team collaboration

For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.

$49USD /mo

Start Pro
Unlimited licensed users
Everything in Solo
Team management and invites
Member, Manager, and Admin access
Timesheet and expense approvals
Team reports and utilization
Per-member billing rates
Granular manager permissions

Business

Advanced operations

For organizations that need integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.

$199USD /mo

Start Business
Everything in Pro
Xero and QuickBooks
Calendar and Jira integrations
Airtable limited preview
Planning and capacity
Advanced report exports
Custom reporting roles and SSO
Priority support
Agents are included

AI agents do not require licenses on any plan.

API on every paid plan

Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.

Exports on every plan

Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.

Build a cleaner billing record for law firm partners, practice managers, billing managers, and legal consultants weighing clio’s practice-first platform against a focused time-and-billing evidence workflow.

Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.

Build a reviewed billable-hour record