A Gingr alternative for reviewing boarding and daycare staff hours, not just clocking them.
Gingr bundles online booking, PreCheck vaccination and waiver verification, payments, staff scheduling, and photo report cards into one platform for boarding kennels, dog daycares, grooming salons, and training businesses, with a Time Clock module that authenticates staff by password and an optional webcam photo and records IP address and device fingerprint on every punch. Its published support documentation describes a permission that lets staff edit, manually add, and delete time clock records — but it does not describe a required reason for a change, an edited-entry flag, or an approval step distinct from that same edit permission. Keito is the layer in between: AI-drafted time entries a staff member confirms, a separate reviewer settles payroll status with any change reasoned and recorded, before the hours become evidence behind payroll.
Entries drafted per shift from the work that happened, confirmed by the staff member
Reviewed, not just editable
An independent review step Gingr’s Time Clock report does not publish
Days to start
Runs alongside Gingr — no replacement for booking, scheduling, or payments
app.keito.ai / kennel-payroll
Illustrative review queue
Example boarding & daycare business
Illustrative pay period
Hours reviewed
Entries confirmed
47
Shifts covered
96
Staff reviewed
11
Hours tied to each shift
Staff member, location, and shift type on every entry
Example
Reviewed before payroll runs
A separate reviewer confirms hours before the batch closes
Example
Evidence behind payroll
Reviewed hours back payroll and labor-cost reporting
Example
01
Built around the work before the invoice
Gingr’s Time Clock lets staff authenticate with a password and an optional webcam photo to clock in and out, recording IP address and device fingerprint on every punch, with hours calculated to the nearest hundredth and viewable on a Timeclock report. Gingr’s own support documentation names the “Can Manage Time Clock Records” permission as what lets staff edit, manually add, and delete punches — covering an optional note on edits and a report toggle to include deleted entries — but it does not describe a required reason for a change, an edited-entry flag, or an approval step distinct from that same edit permission. Keito answers the question that leaves open: did a separate reviewer actually confirm each staff member’s hours, with a recorded reason for any change, before those hours became a labor cost and a paycheck.
Stand up reviewed hours without replacing Gingr
Set up staff, locations, and reviewers in Keito in days — Gingr keeps running booking, PreCheck verification, payments, and staff scheduling exactly as it does today.
Let AI draft the hours for each shift
Keito drafts a time entry from the shift a staff member worked, so they confirm hours for that shift instead of relying on a time clock entry the same edit permission can also delete with only an optional note.
Review each entry, then hand evidence to payroll
A separate reviewer approves payroll status before the period closes, then hands the approved hours to payroll or whichever system tracks labor cost.
02
A Time Clock module bundled into a boarding and daycare platform, not a payroll gate
Gingr logs the punch, with identity checks. Keito adds a reviewer and a recorded reason.
Gingr is published as an all-in-one business-management platform for boarding kennels, dog daycares, grooming salons, training businesses, and dog parks — covering online self-service booking, PreCheck vaccination and waiver verification, integrated payments with card-on-file reconciliation, staff scheduling, and photo-based report cards for pet parents, with enterprise support for multi-location operators. Its Time Clock module is real, documented functionality: staff authenticate with a password and an optional webcam photo to clock in and out, with IP address, device type, and device fingerprint recorded on every punch, hours calculated to the nearest hundredth, and an add-on Employee Scheduling module available to compare punches against scheduled shifts. What Gingr’s published support documentation does not describe, across its Time Clock and time-clock-permission articles, is a required reason for a changed entry, an edited-entry flag, or an approval step distinct from the “Can Manage Time Clock Records” permission that already lets staff edit, manually add, and delete punches — the documentation covers those actions, plus an optional note and a report toggle to include deleted entries, without describing any of those additional controls. Keito’s argument is not that boarding and daycare businesses need a new booking, scheduling, or payments platform — Gingr already publishes all of that. It is that the hours behind a paycheck deserve a reviewer distinct from whoever can edit the punch record, and a recorded reason for any change, not an editable entry with no described review status. Keito drafts a time entry from the scheduled shift, the staff member confirms it, and a separate reviewer settles payroll status before the hours become evidence for a paycheck. The boundary is deliberate: Keito has no booking, scheduling, PreCheck, or payments, and it claims no native Gingr integration, automatic import, or synchronisation. Gingr keeps running the boarding or daycare business; Keito is where the hours behind it get an independent, reasoned review.
Choose Gingr when the business needs online booking, PreCheck verification, payments, staff scheduling, and report cards running from one platform
Choose Keito when the problem is that Gingr’s Time Clock can be edited or deleted under one permission with no described reason, review status, or edit record
Prove it in one pay period: Keito runs alongside Gingr, reviewing staff hours without touching booking or scheduling
Workflow fit
Product shape
Keito keeps Gingr alternative connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Choose Gingr when the business needs online booking, PreCheck verification, payments, staff scheduling, and report cards running from one platform
Choose Keito when the problem is that Gingr’s Time Clock can be edited or deleted under one permission with no described reason, review status, or edit record
Prove it in one pay period: Keito runs alongside Gingr, reviewing staff hours without touching booking or scheduling
03
What Keito adds to Gingr alternative
Hours drafted per shift, confirmed by the staff member
Keito drafts a time entry from the scheduled shift a staff member worked; they confirm and correct it instead of relying on a time clock entry the same edit permission can also delete with only an optional note.
AI-drafted entries with mandatory review
Typed, timed, and manually entered capture
Staff member, location, and payroll status on every record
A recorded reason Gingr’s Time Clock does not require
Gingr documents editing, manually adding, and deleting punches under one “Can Manage Time Clock Records” permission, with an optional note and a report toggle for deleted entries, but no described required reason, edited-entry flag, or approval step distinct from that same permission; Keito’s reviewer settles payroll status for every entry, with a reason recorded for any change, before the period closes.
Independent reviewer approval before payroll
Change reasons recorded, not silently edited or deleted
Payroll status settled before a paycheck goes out
Payroll evidence without replacing Gingr
Reviewers approve staff hours and hand the evidence to payroll or whichever system tracks labor cost, through exports the team designs and tests itself.
Runs alongside Gingr’s booking and scheduling
No native Gingr import assumed
Team-controlled handoff to payroll
04
Compare the workflow
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
AreaKeitoTypical setup
Product shape
A standalone workspace for reviewed, payroll-ready staff hours and labor-cost evidence.
Gingr publishes an all-in-one platform for boarding kennels, dog daycares, grooming salons, and training businesses — online booking, PreCheck verification, payments, staff scheduling, and report cards.
How time is captured
AI drafts a shift-specific entry from the work that happened; the staff member confirms it, and a separate reviewer approves before it becomes a labor cost or paycheck.
Gingr’s Time Clock authenticates staff with a password and an optional webcam photo, recording IP address and device fingerprint on every punch, with permitted staff able to add, edit, or delete entries.
Review before payroll
A reviewer distinct from the editor settles payroll status per entry, with any change reasoned and recorded, before the period closes.
Gingr’s published material describes a permission that lets staff edit, manually add, and delete punches, with an optional note, but no required reason, edited-entry flag, or approval step distinct from that same permission.
Labor cost fit
Built for confirming the specific hours behind a staff member’s shift before they become a labor cost or a paycheck.
Built around booking, scheduling, PreCheck, and payments for a boarding or daycare business, with the Time Clock and its reports as supporting tools, not a payroll gate.
Pricing and adoption
Published flat team pricing and a setup measured in days, run alongside Gingr.
Gingr does not publish dollar pricing on its site; the base Time Clock is included, with an add-on Employee Scheduling module available for comparing punches to scheduled shifts.
Data movement
Team-designed, tested exports and API handoffs moved in deliberate stages.
No native Keito-Gingr import or automatic synchronisation is assumed in either direction; Gingr’s own booking and payments cover client transactions, not payroll review.
It is software a boarding kennel, dog daycare, or grooming business adopts instead of, or alongside, Gingr, which runs online booking, PreCheck verification, payments, and staff scheduling for pet-care businesses. Because Gingr already covers that much of the operation, an alternative rarely replaces all of it at once. Keito is the alternative for the review gap behind Gingr’s Time Clock: AI-drafted entries the staff member confirms, approved by a separate reviewer before those hours become a paycheck.
Does Gingr track staff time, or is it just for booking and scheduling?
It does both. Gingr’s Time Clock lets staff authenticate with a password and an optional webcam photo to clock in and out, recording IP address and device fingerprint on every punch, and staff with the “Can Manage Time Clock Records” permission can add, edit, or delete entries. What Gingr’s published support documentation does not describe is a required reason for a change, an edited-entry flag, or an approval step distinct from that same edit permission.
How is Keito different from Gingr for a boarding or daycare business paying staff hourly?
The gap is a reviewer and a recorded reason, not capture or identity verification. Gingr already authenticates each punch and tracks it on a Timeclock report, but its own documentation on managing time clock records does not describe an approval step distinct from editing, a required reason field, or an edit record. Keito adds that layer: it drafts a time entry from the scheduled shift, the staff member confirms it, and a separate reviewer settles payroll status, with a reason recorded for any change, before the hours become evidence for a paycheck. Gingr still owns booking, PreCheck, scheduling, and payments; Keito owns the independently reviewed hours record.
When should a boarding or daycare business choose Gingr instead of Keito?
Choose Gingr when the business needs online self-service booking, vaccination and waiver verification, payments, staff scheduling, and photo report cards running from one platform — it already covers all of that for boarding, daycare, grooming, and training businesses. Keito does not reproduce any of it: no booking, no PreCheck, no payments, no scheduling. It is the wrong choice if the immediate need is a boarding or daycare operations platform rather than an independently reviewed record of staff hours.
What payroll evidence does Keito keep when booking and scheduling stay in Gingr?
Each reviewed record keeps the staff member, location, shift, duration, description, payroll status, reviewer, approval state, and pay period, tied to the specific shift a staff member worked rather than a time clock punch that could be edited or deleted under the same permission used to run payroll. That package backs the payroll run and gives an owner a reviewed answer when a staff member’s hours are questioned.
Does Keito integrate natively with Gingr, or import its time data automatically?
No. Keito claims no native Gingr integration, automatic import, or two-way synchronisation — Gingr’s own booking, scheduling, payments, and Time Clock belong to its platform, not Keito’s. Capture in Keito is its own workflow: AI-drafted, typed, timed, and manually entered records that pass review before becoming payroll evidence. A boarding or daycare business can keep Gingr for booking, scheduling, and payments and run Keito alongside it as the independent review layer for staff hours, with any transfer between them designed and tested by the team.
03
Start solo.Add people when you need them.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac desktop and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
Solo
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Exports on every plan
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Build a cleaner billing record for boarding kennel owners, dog daycare operators, and grooming-salon or training-business owners running gingr who pay hourly staff across overnight and multi-shift schedules and need independently reviewed, payroll-ready hours instead of an editable time clock record with no established reason or approval step distinct from the edit itself.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.