Keito gives accounting firms one reviewed record for client time, approvals, AI-assisted delivery costs, and invoice evidence when the billing layer needs to be narrower than a desktop practice-management suite.
Illustrative period close
Illustrative billing state
Reviewed
Recorded work
118h
Review items
5
Ready
94%
Client work captured
Engagement and service context
Rate exceptions resolved
Engagement and activity rates confirmed
Invoice evidence approved
Firm-governed downstream handoff
Thomson Reuters Practice CS already documents timesheet, timer, and mobile time entry, expense tracking, flat-fee, progress, time-based, and retainer billing, batch and recurring invoicing, electronic invoices with portal delivery and card payment, and firm, client, and staff dashboards inside the CS Professional Suite. Keito is the narrower choice for firms that want reviewed human and AI-assisted work to become billing evidence in one focused workspace, with explicit boundaries around any transfer.
Decide the clients, engagements, services, contributors, billable rules, reviewers, and billing periods Keito will own before touching live time capture or any project, document, portal, payment, or tax-workflow records the firm keeps in Practice CS and the wider CS Professional Suite.
Resolve missing descriptions, wrong client or service context, non-billable entries, rate questions, AI-assisted delivery costs, and write-off decisions while the team can still explain what happened.
Use approved time and decision context for client summaries, invoice preparation, or a firm-governed downstream workflow without assuming automatic Practice CS import, synchronisation, or reconciliation.
Compare operating scope, not just timers
Thomson Reuters Practice CS documents time-and-billing at its core: timesheet, built-in timer, and Mobile CS time entry, expense capture, billable and non-billable classification, flat-fee, progress, time-based, and retainer billing, markups and markdowns, batch and recurring invoicing, electronic invoices posted to secure client portals with online card payment, accounts receivable tracking, customizable firm, client, and staff dashboards, and profitability analysis, plus optional Project Management, Client Management, and Staff Management modules and deep integration with UltraTax CS, Accounting CS, and the rest of the CS Professional Suite. Buyers should evaluate it as an established, actively sold practice-management platform for accounting firms, not as a product that lacks time or billing capability. Keito answers a narrower question. It keeps professional time, approved AI-agent or model costs, client and engagement context, billable status, descriptions, approvals, scope decisions, and invoice evidence in one focused review workflow. That fits a firm whose delivery and finance reviewers want a single clear source record, whose AI-assisted or technical work needs to sit beside professional time, or whose pricing preference favours a flat team rate over per-user licensing. The boundary matters: Keito does not claim to reproduce Practice CS's project-scheduling, staff-management, client-portal, payment-processing, Outlook-synchronisation, or CS Professional Suite integration capabilities. It does not claim a native Practice CS integration, automatic historical import, two-way synchronisation, payment migration, automatic invoice reconciliation, or a lossless switch. Before changing live work, the firm should decide which system owns clients, engagements, time, invoices, payments, and accounting records; test representative exports or API handoffs; preserve historical evidence; and approve rollback and reconciliation controls.
Choose Practice CS when the firm wants time, billing, payments, project scheduling, staff management, and CS Professional Suite tax integration to stay in one platform
Choose Keito when the priority is a focused reviewed record for human and AI-assisted client work, billing evidence, and flat-rate team participation
Map system ownership, historical records, transfer controls, invoice evidence, and rollback steps before changing the live process
Workflow fit
Keito keeps Practice CS time tracking alternative connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Choose Practice CS when the firm wants time, billing, payments, project scheduling, staff management, and CS Professional Suite tax integration to stay in one platform
Choose Keito when the priority is a focused reviewed record for human and AI-assisted client work, billing evidence, and flat-rate team participation
Map system ownership, historical records, transfer controls, invoice evidence, and rollback steps before changing the live process
Keep client, engagement, service, contributor, duration, billable status, work explanation, and approval state together before finance uses the record for billing or reporting.
Record staff time and approved AI-agent or model costs against the same client project so reviewers assess one delivery record, without implying automatic activity ingestion from Practice CS or any other tool.
Move active capture and review in controlled stages, retain historical source evidence, and validate exports or API-based handoffs rather than expecting a one-click Practice CS migration that Keito does not provide.
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
Primary product scope
Keito focuses on reviewed human and AI-assisted work, billing context, client evidence, and project economics.
Practice CS documents time and expense capture, flexible billing, electronic invoicing, portal payments, dashboards, optional project, client, and staff management modules, and CS Professional Suite integration for accounting firms.
Billing review record
Engagement leads resolve descriptions, scope decisions, billable status, AI-assisted costs, and approval exceptions before records become invoice evidence.
Buyers should verify how Practice CS's current timesheet, timer, rate, batch-invoicing, receivables, and reporting controls match the firm's exact review process.
Team participation
Flat-rate team plans let staff, partners, contractors, and billing reviewers share the Keito workflow without a separate charge for every participant.
Firms should compare current licensing costs for every person who must capture, review, report, administer, or approve work.
Migration boundary
Keito supports a staged, firm-controlled move of active capture and review with explicit exports and handoffs.
No native Practice CS import, two-way synchronisation, payment migration, or automatic invoice reconciliation is assumed.
A Practice CS time tracking alternative is a different system for capturing, reviewing, and using professional work in client billing. Keito is a focused option for firms that want approved human and AI-assisted work, invoice evidence, and project context without running that layer inside a desktop practice-management suite.
Firms should compare client and engagement structure, time capture, rate handling, exception review, approvals, invoicing, payment ownership, reporting, AI-assisted work, migration controls, integrations, and total team cost. Practice CS spans time, billing, payments, dashboards, and optional project, client, and staff modules inside the CS Professional Suite, while Keito concentrates on the reviewed delivery record behind billing.
A firm should keep Practice CS when it wants time, billing, portal payments, project scheduling, staff management, Outlook synchronisation, and UltraTax CS or Accounting CS integration to remain inside one Thomson Reuters platform. Keito suits a narrower reviewed time, approval, AI-cost, and invoice-evidence workflow, so it should not be treated as feature-for-feature replacement parity.
Yes, a firm can migrate the active capture and review process in stages, but Keito does not promise a one-click or lossless Practice CS migration. The firm should map clients, engagements, services, people, billable rates, open work, historical evidence, reviewers, billing cutoffs, exports, and rollback steps before changing live capture.
A Practice CS migration should preserve the client, engagement, service, contributor, duration, billable status, description, rate context, reviewer, approval state, scope or write-off decision, invoice reference, payment status, and reporting period. Keito keeps new reviewed records traceable while the firm retains historical source evidence under its own retention policy.
No native Practice CS, UltraTax CS, or Accounting CS integration, automatic import, or automatic synchronisation is claimed. Keito supports structured capture, review, reporting, exports, API, CLI, and agent-friendly options, but each firm must design, test, approve, and monitor any transfer between Keito, Practice CS, its invoice process, payment systems, and general ledger.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac desktop and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Team collaboration
For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.
Advanced operations
For organizations that need integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
AI agents do not require licenses on any plan.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.