Traqq records screenshots and activity to monitor staff. Keito turns client time into reviewed billing evidence — with project context, an approval step, and flat-rate pricing that does not grow with surveillance seats.
Pre-invoice review
Ready to bill
$19.8k
Active work
24
Reviewed
91%
Ready to bill
$18.4k
Time captured with context
traqq alternative
Billing review complete
Client and project checked
Invoice evidence ready
Approved summary prepared
traqq alternative needs more than a timer. The billing record has to keep client, project, approval, and invoice context together before the work reaches finance.
Migrate client and project structure to Keito so the tracking workflow is familiar from day one — the same fields, the same billing discipline, without the pricing model that drove the switch.
Run the same approval step you relied on before, with the added assurance that the review covers project context, expenses, and billable status in one place.
Use the same billing data to produce client summaries and invoice backup without paying per seat each time the team or contractor roster changes.
Billing over monitoring
Traqq is firmly in the employee-monitoring camp: automatic screenshots, activity levels, and idle detection designed to give managers a window into how remote workers spend their time. That can answer a supervision question, but it does not answer a billing one. When the time has to become a client invoice, none of the monitoring data carries the context that matters — which client and project the work belonged to, whether it was billable, and whether a manager has confirmed it is ready to invoice. So teams that adopt Traqq for oversight still rebuild the billing story afterward from exports, and they pay per seat for the privilege of being watched. Keito comes at the problem from the billing side instead. Time is captured with client, project, and billable context, a review and approval step confirms it before it becomes invoice evidence, and reviewed records export as client-ready summaries finance can trust. Pricing is flat-rate, so a whole delivery team plus reviewers and finance can share the billing workflow without per-seat cost, and AI agent spend can be tracked alongside human hours. For managers who specifically want screenshots, Traqq does that; for a team that wants tracked time to become defensible client invoices — without the surveillance culture that comes with it — Keito is the alternative built for billing.
Capture time with client, project, and billable context instead of screenshots
Add a review and approval step before time becomes an invoice
Flat-rate pricing for the whole delivery, review, and finance team in one workspace
Workflow fit
Keito keeps traqq alternative connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Capture time with client, project, and billable context instead of screenshots
Add a review and approval step before time becomes an invoice
Flat-rate pricing for the whole delivery, review, and finance team in one workspace
Keito is built around the same time capture, review, and invoice summary cycle used by the leading billing-focused time trackers — without the per-seat pricing model.
Add contractors, reviewers, and finance users to the billing workflow without checking whether each addition will increase the monthly tool spend.
Track AI agent costs by client and project alongside your team's billable hours so the full delivery effort is visible in one billing workspace.
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
Reviewed billing vs monitoring
Keito keeps traqq alternative tied to clients, projects, billable status, approvals, and billing summaries in one workspace.
Typical setups capture time in one tool and rebuild the billing explanation later from exports, comments, or spreadsheet cleanup.
Review before invoicing
Managers review entries before they become invoice evidence, so missing context is fixed internally rather than during a client dispute.
Raw timer exports usually reach finance before delivery leads have confirmed whether the work is billable, complete, or client-ready.
Predictable team pricing
Flat-rate plans let delivery staff, reviewers, contractors, and finance users participate without per-seat pricing friction.
Per-seat time trackers make teams choose between clean billing participation and controlling tool spend.
The best way to manage traqq alternative is to capture work at source, attach it to the right client and project, review it before invoicing, and use the reviewed record as billing evidence. Keito is built around that workflow so time, approvals, and invoice context stay connected.
Yes. Keito helps with traqq alternative by tracking work by client, project, task, person, billable status, and review state, then turning approved records into client-ready summaries. That makes the data useful for billing, profitability, and client reporting rather than just attendance.
Keito is different because it treats time as billing evidence, not just duration. A generic timer records how long something took; Keito records who did the work, where it belongs, whether it was reviewed, and how it should appear in client billing context.
Before switching tools for traqq alternative, teams should check client and project structure, approval rules, export needs, historical billing evidence, and whether reviewers can participate without per-seat friction. Keito keeps that migration focused on preserving the billing workflow, not just replacing a timer.
A client-ready traqq alternative report should include the client, project, task, contributor, billable status, approval state, and a concise explanation of the work completed. Keito keeps those details connected so reports can answer client questions without exposing internal delivery noise.
Solo includes 1 licensed user, unlimited AI agents, Mac desktop and iOS apps, Stripe payments, and standard CSV and Excel exports. Pro adds your team. Business adds integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
1 licensed user
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Team collaboration
For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.
Advanced operations
For organizations that need integrations, planning, advanced reporting, and stronger controls.
AI agents do not require licenses on any plan.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Solo, Pro, and Business include standard CSV and Excel data export.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.