Keito gives tech leads a reviewed sprint delivery record — by client, project, and team member — so billing conversations start from the same data as delivery retrospectives.
Tech lead report
Sprint delivery
94.2h
Reviewed
87.4h
Client-attributed
82%
Overhead
6.8h
Sprint work captured
Per engineer and project
Billable entries reviewed
Non-billable separated
Client delivery report
Sprint summary prepared
Tech leads are closest to the delivery work. Keito makes that context useful for billing without adding reporting overhead.
Record time by client, project, and team member role so billing reports reflect actual team composition without needing a separate tracking system per person.
Give project leads a combined view of who worked on what, what is billable, and whether the team effort matches the client story before invoice prep starts.
Produce summaries that explain team effort by deliverable, milestone, or service area so clients understand what they are paying for.
Sprint billing bridge
Tech leads often have the clearest view of what the team built, which work was client-facing, and what was internal overhead — but that context lives in standups and Slack, not in billing records. Keito gives tech leads a structured way to capture that delivery context as it happens, review it before the billing cycle closes, and produce a sprint delivery report that finance can use without asking for clarification.
Tag engineering work by client and project at the point of delivery, not during a month-end reconstruction
Separate billable implementation from non-billable support, review, and internal tooling work
Produce a sprint delivery summary that answers client billing questions before they are asked
Workflow fit
Keito keeps tech lead time reporting connected to client, project, billable status, approval, and invoice context before the work reaches finance.
Tag engineering work by client and project at the point of delivery, not during a month-end reconstruction
Separate billable implementation from non-billable support, review, and internal tooling work
Produce a sprint delivery summary that answers client billing questions before they are asked
Keito keeps time entries connected to the projects and clients they serve so tech leads can produce sprint delivery summaries that explain the engineering work in client billing language.
Tech leads can review the team's entries before billing review starts — catching unclear descriptions, missing project tags, and non-billable work that should not appear in the client summary.
Use the same sprint tracking data for client delivery reports, billing summaries, and internal utilization reviews — without producing separate reports for each audience.
The difference is not just recording time. It is whether the record can support billing, project decisions, and client conversations.
Sprint delivery context
Captured at delivery and available for billing review immediately.
Delivery context lives in Jira/Slack and must be reconstructed for billing.
Billing review step
Tech leads can review entries before finance sees them.
Finance often reviews raw timesheet exports without delivery context.
Client and internal reports
Same data source for client and internal delivery reporting.
Client reports require manual reformatting of internal sprint data.
Tech leads should ensure team entries are tagged by client and project, classified as billable or non-billable, and reviewed for accurate descriptions before the billing cycle closes. A sprint delivery summary built from this reviewed data gives finance the evidence they need without requiring a separate reporting step.
Yes. Keito's project and team views provide delivery context useful for both sprint retrospectives and billing discussions. Teams use the same reviewed data for internal capacity reviews and client billing summaries.
Engineers on billable teams need a low-friction way to tag work by client and project, classify entries as billable or non-billable, and attach enough description that the tech lead and finance reviewer can confirm billing accuracy without follow-up questions.
Solo is built for one human owner and unlimited AI agents. Pro adds human teammates. Business adds integrations, exports, and online invoice payments.
One human owner
For independent consultants, freelancers, and small studios running work with AI agents.
Team collaboration
For teams that need shared workspaces, approvals, and team-level project visibility.
Advanced operations
For organizations that need integrations, exports, online payments, and stronger controls.
AI agents do not count as human seats on any plan.
Solo, Pro, and Business can use API keys for agent workflows.
Stripe payments, exports, Xero, and QuickBooks are on Business.
Start with Solo, add people on Pro when you need reviewers or collaborators, and see how Keito turns tracked effort into clearer reports.